{"id":4179,"date":"2018-05-01T17:54:36","date_gmt":"2018-05-02T00:54:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/?p=4179"},"modified":"2018-06-22T07:21:57","modified_gmt":"2018-06-22T14:21:57","slug":"the-all-menu-is-gone-in-recent-windows-outlook-2016-inbox-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/the-all-menu-is-gone-in-recent-windows-outlook-2016-inbox-update\/","title":{"rendered":"The &#8220;All&#8221; Menu is Gone in recent Windows Outlook 2016 Inbox Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>May 1, 2018<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Almost exactly a year ago, Microsoft changed the menus at the top of the Windows Desktop Outlook 2016 Inbox. By &#8220;menus&#8221; I mean the sorting and filtering controls right above the list of mail, but below the Ribbon menus.<\/p>\n<p>What they&#8217;d had for most of 2016 through May of 2017 was this sequence of controls\/buttons that you see at the top of the image below, specifically: <strong>All; Unread; By Date; and Newest.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/michaellinenberger.com\/images\/inbox-top-menus-2017-may.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"435\" height=\"155\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In May of 2017 they replaced that with simply the folder name (<strong>Inbox<\/strong>), and an &#8220;<strong>All<\/strong>&#8221; menu, as shown here:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/images\/compact-layout-new-headers.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"203\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Or if your window was wider it looked like this, with Search box to right:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/michaellinenberger.com\/images\/inbox-top-menus-2017-later.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"95\" \/><\/p>\n<p>That new All menu on the right collected all the same menus\u00a0the previous controls had, but squished them all together into one menu item. That was a lot of stuff to fit in one menu, so you needed to use submenus to get to things. I received a number of complaints from users who didn&#8217;t like\u00a0the new All menu, bemoaning having to go two levels down in menus to get to the controls they previously got to in one step.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Back to the Future (menu-wise)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Well, I noticed today that in the most recent monthly Outlook 2016 build update (Version 1804, Build 9226.2114), Microsoft has reverted back to almost the exact same design as a year ago. Here&#8217;s a recent screenshot of the new look:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/images\/2018-05-01-new-outlook-inbox-top.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"110\" \/><\/p>\n<p>You can see the only difference from a year ago is the sorting direction arrow on the far right&#8212;it now has no label since the arrow is now the control. But otherwise we are back to the old design. And the folder name <strong>Inbox<\/strong> is gone, as it was a year ago.<\/p>\n<p>I can&#8217;t say I really care one way or the other, but probably prefer the new resumed old\u00a0look. It gives me quicker access to sorting controls. It removes submenus, which are often a pain to use. And I don&#8217;t need an Inbox label. However these flip-flopping changes make documenting Outlook in my books and videos (my self-assigned job) a bit of a moving target. Let&#8217;s hope Microsoft sticks with\u00a0one design for a while!<\/p>\n<p>Michael<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>May 1, 2018 Almost exactly a year ago, Microsoft changed the menus at the top of the Windows Desktop Outlook 2016 Inbox. By &#8220;menus&#8221; I mean the sorting and filtering controls right above the list of mail, but below the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/the-all-menu-is-gone-in-recent-windows-outlook-2016-inbox-update\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4179"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4179\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4303,"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4179\/revisions\/4303"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.michaellinenberger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}