In the big online world of misinformation about email and work habits, it is refreshing to read this thoughtful article in the NY Times about the importance of responding to incoming email.
The author’s point is that workflows break down if email is not a reliable way for people with reasonable work messages to reach you. People are forced to seek you out in person or on a call, which takes much longer. He even says that for managers, email non-responsiveness has become a marker of ineffectiveness when those above you consider you for promotions and new roles—bad email habits can be career limiting.
My thoughts? It depends on the industry and corporate culture of course, but I largely agree. Here are my rules on email responsiveness that go well beyond that article:
Reasonable Response Time
Email readers and writers should assume that a reasonable response time for email is around 24 hours. If, as an email writer, you have an emergency that needs a faster response, use another medium (phone call, text, IMS, or even a walk-in personal visit). (The exception to this is for those in a quick-response help desk or emergency team where quick email response IS expected. But that’s not most of you.)
Supervisors: Don’t Demand Instant Email Response
So, as a supervisor, don’t try to use emails as your method of getting quick responses from your staff. Don’t send an email and then 30 minutes later call the recipient and say “Hey, didn’t you get my email, I need this now.” That forces your staff to be constantly monitoring their Inbox which means they will get lost in other low-priority mail all day. That will lead to them being non-productive for real work. You as the supervisor should use a phone call (or other agreed-to faster means) for urgent, quicker-than-24-hour matters.
Continue reading →